Stationary Engine List

By Staff
Published on February 1, 2002
article image

A brief update on the December cover story about the B.D.
Tillinghast half-breed: Tillie has finally made her journey across
the pond, arriving safely the beginning of December. At some point
her crate suffered a close encounter with a fork lift, evidenced by
two neat holes punched through the end wall of the crate, just
either side of the head of the engine, but not causing any damage.
Dismantling the crate was cold, but fun, and by the end of the day
Tillie was sitting on our trailer.

Now to business. Some time back I ran an article about running
an engine with a flywheel that had a cracked spoke. Much of the
discussion at that time centred around safety issues, but this time
we have a different sort of crack, on the hub, and the solutions
presented were interesting, as one might expect. As ever, the
following comments reflect a variety of opinions that surfaced
during this discussion.

I just got the cracked flywheels from my 2 HP earl-style
Galloway back. They were repaired by a welder who has 20 years
experience. I made sure the flywheels went on easy, inserted the
key, and as soon as I started tapping it in, it cracked in both
places again. The other wheel seems to be okay, for now. Anyway, I
will go with this for now and look into new cast flywheels when I
win the lotto.

Rest assured gang, THIS WILL NOT RUN IN SHOWS OR PARADES.

That wheel can be welded, but it will need to be in a hot bed to
stress-relieve it ’til cold, and it should have a lot of
peening while cooling – DON’T run it cracked.

I have seen a flywheel that had a cracked hub come off the
crankshaft at a show, which I gather is the problem given the
description of the fitting and subsequent cracking as the key was
inserted. Shrink a ring on it and be done with it!

The idea of using a ‘sweat ring’ brought out a lot more
questions and answers, starting with exactly what it is, before
progressing to how to fit one and the best material to use.

A sweat ring is a piece of round metal, heated to a high
temperature and placed onto the outside of a round metal object,
which is usually cooled before applying the ring. A good practice
is to turn the object, in this case a flywheel hub from a Galloway
flywheel, so you get a good surface. After placing the ring onto
the object, let them cool down naturally meaning just leave it
until it is cool. This same principal can be applied to a sleeve,
but the OD of the sleeve would be five to 10 thousandths
larger.

If one were to fabricate a sweat ring, what kind of steel should
be used? I was thinking about using seamless pipe, but don’t
know its characteristics. I need to do a little more research on
the cause of the cracks.

Plain old garden variety hot-rolled steel works well. Pipe,
whether it has a welded seam or is seamless, will work, if it can
be found in the right size. The ring should be about a 1/4-inch
thick and as wide as possible. Put the flywheel in the deep freeze
and warm the ring up to a black red. Drop it on, making sure it is
in the right place, and let it all cool/warm to ambient temp.

A ring shrunk on the hub is a good repair. The centrifugal
forces placed on that hub are minor compared to those placed on the
rim.

While I don’t feel this flywheel would ever explode, I
don’t think it will stay in place on the crankshaft. Since it
is a Galloway flywheel (i.e., rare) it is worth repairing. That
said, it is worth repairing correctly.

I believe it was suggested that CRS was a suitable ring
material. I would recommend you use a good, readily available alloy
with good heat-treating characteristics, such as 4140. I also
recommend using at least pre-hardened 4140, or even better heat
treat it to Rc 40/45.

Realistically, you can make this ring .002 to .010 interference
fit. If you use dead soft CRS, the higher interference fit is a
mute point, because as the ring cools the hoop stress will exceed
the yield strength of the CRS and the ring will stretch, thus
limiting the amount of available compression you can put on the
hub.

However, if you use a heat-treated alloy, that ring will
tolerate a much greater hoop stress before failing/yielding.

What this boils down to is that by using a high-strength ring
you can make a much smaller ring to do the same job. This will
allow the repair to be inconspicuous, and with a little effort the
repair could be made to match the original contour of the hub.
Equal attention should be given to preparing the hub. The hub
should be turned to allow 100 percent contact to the ring – if not,
the ID of the flywheel will become egg-shaped.

Another way to shrink your flywheel hub is to shoot a fire
extinguisher at it. We have done this at work when we need to cool
something fast. It’s not as good as dry ice, but does work

Can someone provide some info for the proper interference for a
sweat ring?

There is no hard and fast rule here. The greater the
interference fit the larger the ring required to support the
resulting hoop stress. Here at work I shrink rolling mill sleeves
onto shafts with .015 interference! But that hoop stress is
supported with a ring of 4340 or H13 alloy steel at an Rc hardness
of 43-45. The cross sectional area is 9-inch square. The sleeves
have an OD of 12-inch, an ID of 8-inch, and are 4-1/2-inch
wide.

I’m betting .002 interference will be just fine.

Made a few measurements on a 3 HP Herc last night. The hub is
3-3/8-inch OD. Maximum width ring that could be shrunk on is
3/4-inch. If the hub(s) were cut 3/8-inch deep/side the new hub
diameter would be 2 5/8-inch.

Yesterday I speculated on .002 interference fit. I am upping
that to .006 after looking at this.

Someone asked about split hubs. If you are lucky enough to only
have to ring one side, then shrink the ring on after the flywheel
is back on the crankshaft and clamped. If having to do the inside,
too, clamp the flywheel on a piece of TG&P, then turn both
sides/hubs. Then unclamp and remove TG&P. Fabricate a wedge
(with slide-hammer provisions) to support the gap (but not expand
it) after you shrink the inside ring on. Once the flywheel is on
the shaft, use a slide hammer to remove the support wedge, tighten
the clamp bolt, then shrink the outer ring on.

I have spent many years repairing all manner of farm equipment
with all kinds of cast-iron pulleys, sprockets and gears. Many of
these run at fairly high RPMs (1,500 to 2,500). Over the years I
have had to make repairs with out the best tools or supplies for
the job. I won’t present this as ‘the way,’ only as how
I would likely attack this problem if it were mine on, say, a
high-speed combine pulley and I wanted to be very sure of it.

First off, I would turn the hub with a shoulder for a ring on
both sides. Next, I would bore the center out well beyond the
keyway, but leave as much meat as possible. Then I would braze the
cracks, both inside and out, followed by reboring the inner bore.
At that point the cracks should still be well brazed but the
surface back to clean cast. Next, I would turn a loose press-fit
sleeve for the bore, but leave the inside hole under-size. After
pressing it in I would braze it in place from both sides. Bore the
inside to shaft size and cut a new keyway in the sleeve. The sleeve
should be twice as thick as the depth of the keyway. Lastly, return
the shoulders and shrink on a couple of heavy rings. I might even
be tempted to braze those, too. If I did I would maybe turn them
and the shoulders with a slight taper and press them on tightly.
Cool the flywheel and heat the ring well.

Has anybody ever considered putting a ‘tire’ on the
outside of a flywheel? If one would fabricate a steel tire or band
such as they did with wooden carriage wheels, I would imagine the
flywheel could still be used with less chance of explosion,
possibly making it a functional engine?

I’m not sanctioning what was done, but I know a fellow who
shrunk a tire onto a flywheel on a 3 HP Fuller & Johnson. In
order to make both look the same, he put one on the opposite side,
as well.

This engine appeared to have been rolled down a mountainside.
The guy found it all busted up and half buried in the mud alongside
a creek. One of the flywheels was in many pieces. He found
everything except one spoke.

In as strong a statement I could make I warned him not to
attempt to reassemble the flywheel. He was determined and
wouldn’t let what anyone said stop him. At that juncture I said
he should at least shrink a tire onto it. He paid attention to that
advice, at least.

To replace the missing spoke he went to the local salvage yard
and broke one out of a wheel he found there. After everything was
welded back together and the tire shrunk on, he hooked the engine
to an electric motor and tested it by deliberately running it over
its rated speed. He says he will never run it in public (but, when
he passes from the scene, I wonder what the possibly unsuspecting,
subsequent owners will do?)

I, being new to cast iron, appreciate this more than you can
imagine. I love this little Galloway. It did run, prior to
restoration. But there are so many people here in Helena, Mont.,
who want to see this baby, I’ve just got to make it safe.
Bottom line – I need new flywheels.

The information given here by contributors to the Stationary
Engine List was interspersed with comments about safety aspects. As
these were covered in the previous article about cracked flywheels,
this time I focused on technical information. But for the owner of
the Galloway , the safety aspect had to take priority, and it
did.

Happy New Year to all, and thanks to GEM for letting us share
some of the discussions we have via the Internet with you.

Engine enthusiast Helen French lives in Leicester, England.
Contact her via e-mail at: Helen@insulate.co.uk. Join the ATIS
mailing list at: http://www.atis.net

Online Store Logo
Need Help? Call 1-866-624-9388